Persian
Resistance Manifesto:
A suggestion to the Iranian Patriots
by Michael J. McCoy
For friend Ali,
who thought it was worth risking his life in protest,
because he wanted to have hope.
But in the end his government betrayed him,
and so did the mullahs of his religion.
May they all rot in a unique hell constructed just for them!
Resistance to exploitation, oppressive authoritarian rule, restrictive regulations for controlling every aspect and movement of society, including academic inquiry, art, poetry and freedom of a belief and speech, is as old as history itself. Resistance may be viewed as the natural response of the human being to such injustices, and, so is no doubt a part of prehistory as well. If a lion is cornered, certainly no one would question the just right of the lion to fight its way to freedom. And, so there must be no questioning of the ethics, morality, even duty, of people to resist now at this time in history--it is their right!
This commentary reflects my point of view on resistance, which I am convinced must always be "formal" and "calculating" if it is to be successful. By successful I mean it must result in political and sociological self-determination. In that regard, then, this is rudimentary scaffolding from which to build to that end, and without my being forced to engage in any polemics regarding it. I am in hopes you will not believe anything I've proposed here, nor think that I am insisting it is how you must think and act. Rather, I hope you will test every premise or assumption, argue it among yourselves, and reject and/or accept only of what you are convinced. As a bare minimum, I am in hopes the Patriots will continue utilization of resistance as a desirable, albeit limited, method to achieve self-determination for the Iranian people.
At the outset, it is important to understand that, historically, resistance is always the result of the overt actions of the oppressors. The resistance begins only after the patience of the "long-enduring" populace reaches a breaking point. That breaking point may be for various reasons, but is never the preplanned sinister plot emanating from the downtrodden masses. It may appear to be sparked by a seemingly, or actually insignificant issue, which is, in reality, the "last straw" that blows the lid off the simmering societal pressure-cooker. Equally important is that the resistance will generally follow fairly standard protocol, i.e. stages, in response to the very predictable actions of the established regime, which is trying to maintain its power and fringe benefits at any cost.
It is imperative to understand that the dictatorial government is exceptionally dangerous; it has all the guns, finances, structures and machinery of absolute power, and will not give them up willingly, without a bitter, brutal fight! Be under no delusion about this, please. However, this does not mean that the resistance cannot win out in the end. Nevertheless, it is likely to be a long, hard and personally costly affair, which must be accepted by all those active participants of the resistance.
Each stage of the protocol carries clearly discernible characteristics, as well as very real potential dangers to the resistors, and traps that will be laid by the regime. To know in advance is to be forewarned, to be forewarned is to be prepared, to be prepared, is to develop alternate routes of escape, to come back to resist repeatedly. (This "repeatedly" is the secret weapon of resistance, forming the main tactic to wear down the oppressive regime--until it crumbles. It then becomes a major part of the strategy to protect this tactic no matter what else happens!) The historical witness, both ancient and modern, shows clearly that the resistance of the people can and does win against oppressive authoritarian governments, including against their well-equipped paramilitaries, secret services, and special armies. Let's begin examining the stages of resistance, and their evolution from one stage to the next.
Frequently enough, the first stage is a kind of mass struggle, at first taking the form of peaceful protests for grievances to be heard. This may be in the forms of articles, petitions, and/or demonstrations in the streets. This is the point of the first real danger, in the form of governmental response. Most authoritarian, dictatorial regimes view their population as "mere children" needing to be mollycoddled, but incapable of being adults. (At least the ones who have been left alive, that is.) So, the first response is likely to be mild amusement that the "children" are acting up again, how sweet! Though it's not limited to them, theocracies are especially prone to this. It may be one that controls the state, as in Iran, or one where the state is in a league with religion, as is currently the case in Russia. I would include Communism in this as well, because, in its functionality, it is really a secular religion, and as repressive. The strategy here is that if the "parents" simply acknowledge the childish antics, then the children will go back to play with their blocks again. After all, what the little ones are really seeking is simply attention. (Remember Ahmadinejad's comment about the protests being like the turmoil after a football game?) OK, so the danger is in whether or not the protesters are willing to buy into this definition, and assume the position of children again. If they do buy into it, then it was useless to have protested in the first place, but if not, well then, it moves to the next stage.
Stage two often remains in the arena of peaceful protest, but is considerably more determined to resist. It also starts moving towards being multifaceted, i.e. into many different avenues for protest, all of which are dictated by the immediate circumstances. Examples could include spontaneous causal and disjointed organization, distribution of "homegrown" informal publications, pamphlets and tracts, banners and spray-painted slogans on buildings, as well as an expanding number of chanted mottoes. These slogans and mottoes are a major indication that resistance is undergoing a transmutation in the philosophical and psychological underpinnings of the people, and are the first signs that a true movement may be being born. Now the totalitarian regime actually recognizes that it has a real potential problem on its hands, and moves to counter it. This is danger number two of governmental response; beware!
However, before examining the nature and specifics of this second danger, it is necessary to address at least one item the regime has in its arsenal for defeating any resistance. The most insidious, but standard to oppression, is the fact that such regimes "wrap" themselves in what I call "legalize," that is, a show of so called democratically enacted legislation, but which, in fact, has one purpose only--to keep them and their cronies in power. ALL of these are designed to maintain the power elite at the standard of living and other privileges to which they have become accustomed. In this way, they can appeal to the law of the land for justification of their actions, but which, as you will see, are in fact unjust and without conscience.
A very recent example of this from South America was the arrest by the Honduran military, and subsequent exile, of President Zelaya, on the grounds he had violated the law, which he hadn't! The 'behind-the-scenes' reality here is the oligarchic alliances between landowners, businessmen, judiciary and military to maintain the status quo, i.e. that they rule without concessions to the majority of poverty stricken Hondurans. The reason these Honduran power elites do not want the possibility of any president holding a second term, is that he/she might become so popular with the people that their privileged power could be undermined. So they crafted the constitution to allow only one term, and then claimed Zelaya was 'about' to violate the legal constitutional law, and they did it with the support of the judiciary. All of this is, of course, a lie, but does it sound familiar? Moving on to danger number two.
Whatever the nature of the original complaint(s), the regime begins asserting that all its actions were proper and legitimate (i.e. legal under the law) and therefore the resistance is unjustifiable. However, who is in control of all the actions, and what laws are they using? It is the power elite who is in complete control, and the laws being used are those constructed to protect them from any scrutiny or reasonable accountability to those being acted upon--the people! Then, predictably, the regime attempts to throw a magnanimous curve ball, it offers a 'compromise.' Please note that the compromise it offers is always disingenuous (because the only 'virtue' such a totalitarian regime embraces is maintenance of absolute power) and leaves them in complete control. This may be couched in 'understanding' terminology, like, "Of course you are mistaken, but to demonstrate what a good father I am, here, you can have this ice-cream, and it will make you feel all better now." It is, by no stretch of imagination, an outrageous insult to the intellectual integrity of the people.
In the case of your disputed elections in Iran, the original demand was for a new election. This was entirely sidestepped by the powers that be, and the compromise offered was a recount of 10% of the votes. Certainly, Mousavi and the others were right in refusing to accept this, and for good reasons. Firstly, where did these particular votes come from, and who selected them? How is it that 10% is representative of the actual votes anyway? Was this 10% part of the original rigging? If this was really a legitimate solution, why not invite in international participation to do the actual recount of all ballots and then certify the results, or to supervise a new election? Regardless of whether the election was a fraud or not, the real reason this, or something similar, was not done boils down to the exercise of power. To put it bluntly, "I am the grand exalted leader, the all-powerful pooh-bah of the universe, and you are only children, so who are you to question ME?"
Step three of resistance is most often the absolute and public refusal of the people to accept the government response, period, and the demand for sweeping reforms! This is met by the regime with entrenching within its power base. It is here that the regime reveals its true nature for all to see, breaking its own laws and viciously turning on the people in successive bloodbaths. The danger now is that the people will retreat in horror, giving up meaningful resistance to save life and limb. No one, who is not directly affected by this reality, has any right to criticize the choices that only individuals have the right to make. Certainly, cessation of resistance is what the illegitimate regime is hoping, and for which it will deploy all its resources to accomplish. If, however, the people are going to in any way recover and continue resistance, then many stark realities need to be faced coldly, calculatingly and with steeling of the collective will. Brave people of Iran, please forgive me that I now take the liberty to relate certain particulars, some of which you know altogether too well already.
One stark reality needing to be faced is: who are the enemies to your freedom that you now face? This is of utmost importance to define, and about which you must be without doubt. Please be patient with me, as there can be no 'shading' of this matter if you are to be effective in your resistance. So, first of all, who is responsible for the beatings, arrests, torture, rapes and merciless slaughter of protesters? Who initiated, and authorized it? For those who are genuinely and graciously devout, I am grieved to relate the following.
I am not an Iranian, but as I watched and listened to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's sermon (which I did intently) at that fateful Friday Prayers, it became obvious to me that he was, in fact, authorizing violence against lawful protesters, and that his tears were a cheap theatrical stunt! He, himself, was calling out and setting loose his basij monsters to tear the people to pieces. To claim that some underling is to blame, including the despicable Ahmadinejad (though he and others are complicit) is another of the grand lies of this regime. There is nothing that happens in Iran without the consent and knowledge of the Supreme Leader. One of many things that struck me when I watched the video showing where Neda was buried, and the row upon row of freshly dug graves...ready and waiting. I knew instantly the regime was planning to kill lots of people; it was all thought out in advance. The only reason Khamenei shut down one prison, was because the son of an influential man was killed there. He IS your enemy.
However, there are others who also must be identified (which we will continue to do shortly) unequivocally as enemies to your freedom. This is necessary in order to properly evaluate the forces arrayed against you, and to begin developing strategy and tactic to continue resistance. If resist is what you really want to do, then now is not too early to define resistance to what end, i.e. what do you want to be the result? You, who identify with the democracy movement in Iran must define that for yourselves. I've seen your protests referred to as 'revolution,' though it appears to me at this point to be a civil rights movement, yet in the process of being born. For now, as a possibility, please consider seriously Dr. Gene Sharp's words: "We have argued here that overthrow of the dictatorship or removal of the present dictators is not enough. The objective in these conflicts needs to be the establishment of a free society with a democratic system of government."(1) With this as a 'working' beginning, let's identify the other "present dictators" of this dictatorial regime. The following is a listing of those from whom you must not expect any help in your cause, or even dare to trust them in anything--except ruthlessness!
General Hassan Firouzabadi, the Joint Chief of Staff of regular military and Revolutionary Guards, and Hezbollah shock troops. He has vowed to use the military against the people of Iran.
Hossein Hamedani, deputy commander of basij militia, and one of many responsible for beatings, abductions, tortures, rapes and executions of Iranians.
Brigadier General Yadollah Javani, head of political bureau, and propaganda director of Revolutionary Guards, who wants to blind "completely" the eyes of protesters, and "gouge" them out.
Mojtaha Khamenei, (a one time?) commander of basij assassins, the likely organizer of fraudulent election,
Hossein Shariat Madari, editor of Keyhan Newspaper, tool of supreme leader and intelligence services, and an interrogator at Evin prison.
Prosecutor General Saeed Mourtazavi, known as the "butcher of the press," and responsible for detention, torture and death of unknown numbers of Iranian journalists and citizens.
Brigadier General Ahmad-Reza Radan, acting police chief of Teharan, responsible for punishing thousands of young "criminals" detained for offending Islamic morals, some resulting in hangings.
Brigadier General Qassem Soleimani, commander of Quods Force, and who answers directly to Ali Khamenei.
Mojtaba Zolnour, is Khamenei's representative to the Revolutionary Guards, ensuring everyone in the command structure is loyal to the supreme leader. He claims that nearly everyone has confessed.
These constitute the most ferocious and strongest wall of defense around the authoritarian regime, and rightly identified as part of the "band of dictators." That is not to say, as resistance gains adherents and celebrates some minor successes, farther down the road that lower ranking individual military officers and personnel will not be secretly supportive. Nevertheless, those at the top of whatever branch of the existing regime and its various ministries must not be trusted, parleyed with, or entered into negotiations with for any reason. Second, third and fourth in command must not be trusted either. The same goes for the latest appointments and reshuffling of officials. Inspired by a statement the South American freedom fighter, Che Guevara, made,(2) this latter group may be viewed as what I have referred to as "the dictator with the smiling face." Certainly that phrase is worth remembering, as the regime will present such a face repeatedly--do not allow yourselves to be deceived, or weaken your resolve. The dictator with the smiling face will never let you be free, only add a few more rings to the chain already attached to your ankle, so that you feel you are!
The role of clergy in all this also demands resolute examination, and willingness to face the clear facts, no matter your emotional response or wishful thinking. They are also part of the forces arrayed against a longing for your own free society and democratic way of life. In most oppressive regimes to even use the word 'democracy' can land you in prison. Who is forbidding you to use it now? Please understand, I am not saying one should hold this religion or that one, or none at all. What I'm saying is that, historically, when the clerics are ruling the society it has not forebode well for the people's freedom in all respects. This is so no matter what theocracy it is, whether Judaism, Islam, Confucianism, Hinduism, Buddhist, or within Christianity: Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Protestantism, Mormonism and the Byzantine Empire. And, always, the rights of children and women have suffered. Don't take my word for it. Go look for yourselves.
I'm Irish, and it took us 800 years to get the British Empire out of our country, including many bloody battles. Once we were free, do you know what we discovered? We discovered it was the clergy who had sold us out in the first place, literally, to the British...so the Pope could use the king to collect the Papal taxes, that we Irish were refusing to pay. It was for power and money, while the clergy grew fat and the people starved! Persia, too, has a long history of clergy betrayals, some even back into pre-Islamic time. Witness the seminal work of Ferdowsi, Shahnameh, about Prime Minister Mazdak,(3) and more recent clergy involvement as well.(4) Use of religion can be especially insidious as a control and repression mechanism, because of its psychological advantage, which lulls the people into a state of acquiescence--as it speaks for God, so who can "dare" to resist the clergy.
Certainly, your own Dr. Shariati's convictions on "religious government" are of particular relevance for Iran today, where he says:
"A religious regime is one in which, instead of the political figures, religious figures take up political and governmental positions. In other words, a religious regime means the rule of the clerics. One natural consequence of such a regime is dictatorship, because the cleric views himself as God's representative who carries out His orders on earth, and therefore, people have no right to express their opinions, or criticize and oppose him.
"A religious leader considers himself automatically a leader (of the state) due to being a cleric and religious scholar, not due to the people's vote, view and approval. Thus, he is also a ruler without any responsibility (for whatever he does), and this (thinking) is the mother of the dictatorship by one person (over the masses). And because he considers himself the shadow and representative of God (on earth), he also rules over people's lives and belongings. He allows no doubt (to be expressed) in any oppression and repression that he commits, because he sees God's approval (satisfaction) in it (in what he does). Aside from this, he does not recognize any rights, even the right to live, for the opposition and followers of other religions, because he considers them as the target of God's wrath, deviated from the true path, unclean, and an enemy of (his) religion's path, and views their oppression as God's justice."(5)
The only real and lasting solution is a separation of religion from secular government, with no religion either supported by it, or in a favored status. Talk to your parents and grand parents, and ask them: "When you voted 30 years ago, did you really think this is what we would get? Did you even dream that the clergy would progressively hijack our country, and our freedoms stolen from us? A country where now old men sentence women to be beaten for how they dress, and children are raped and hung to death? Is this the country you really wanted for us?" My friends, you must add the clergy to your list, and especially the most ruthless and powerful ones...you must do it! Please forgive me but here, then, is a start:
Ahmad Khatami, a member of the Assembly of Experts, who wants to charge protesters as "mohareb" (those who wage war against God) and sentence them to death.
Hojatoleslam Mostafa Pourmohammadi, who, among his other "stunning" achievements, was put in charge of the "Death Committees" responsible for massacres of some 30,000 political prisoners ordered by Ayatollah Khomeini. He is often in charge of maintaining the power of the clerical monarchy.
Ayatollah Mohammad Taghi Mesbah Yasdi, member of the Assembly of Experts, spiritual leader of Ahmadinejad, Revolutionary Guard and basij, and noted for his role in the brutal suppression of the reformist movement a decade ago.
Other notables, could well include the following mullahs, and others, with private accounts in foreign banks:
Ali Khamenei, = approximately 282 millions.
Ali Akbar Hashemi Rasfandjani, = approximately one billion, and 247 millions.
Mohammad Ali Tasskhiri, = approximately 340 millions.
Mohammad Golpayegani, = approximately 87 millions.
Ahmad Jannati, = approximately 54 millions.
Abdollah Nategh Nouri, = approximately 187 millions.
Abbas Vaez-Tabassi, = approximately 313 millions.
Abbas-Ali Forooghi, = approximately 10 millions (a mere pauper by comparison).
Not even counting all the other mullah bank accounts (does God even know how many mullahs there really are?), or accounts for other officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran, but just from above, it's a cool 2,520,000,000 folks. Let's see if I've got this right: China and Russia buy oil from Iran's government. Iran supports foreign fighters in Lebanon and elsewhere. Russia and China sell weapons to the dictator, and China gets to dump its cheap, inferior products into Iran, putting Iranians out of work. The Revolutionary Guard sells their products to Iranian citizens also, thereby helping to fund their repression of the people. Then the clergy deposit huge amounts of money in offshore banks. Of course, who could doubt the integrity of the clergy in such an operation? Don't you see? It's all about their power, their money, their privileges, and their perks! Well, and, they do get to run around wearing such holy-looking robes and all, spouting platitudes about how 'we' should live godly lives. I can think of only one word, "farce."
OK, so now you have a pretty good idea of the forces arrayed against your resistance movement, and you as individuals. Where do you go from here, what will be you resistance strategy? What is your step number four? As tiring as it sounds, and IS, you begin with deciding that you absolutely must plan ahead. You bring together a small, select group of your best minds, some of which (though not all) must have an eye for detail. The number of people at this point is roughly five, but no more than nine. (In a moment we'll look at who is the leader of the planning, and how this group is selected.) For now, think in terms of asking a series of "what-ifs?" Of necessity, the very first one is "what if we take head-on all the forces arrayed against us, i.e. a frontal attack? (Now, everybody look up at the ceiling, picturing in your mind all the military, air force, navy, basij, and of course, mullahs in front of you.) So if you did the frontal attack, what would be the result, and is that what you want to happen? Unless you've decided that being killed (literally) will further the resistance, you then discard this idea (for now) as not a desirable strategy.
However, each of the components making up the oppressive regime is not all powerful alone, and by now is probably paranoid because of your past resistance and demonstrations, etc. So, "what-if" we selected the one that would be the least likely immediate physical threat? As illustration, I'm going to say you decide part of your strategy will be chipping-away at the confidence and security of the mullahs. Think in terms of your 'army' being this small group, for the moment, and answer: "How can we do it, and have the desired result?" Anything is worth considering, and nothing is a dumb possibility to consider, even if later you decide we'd better not do that. How you decide to take action is "one tactic" (tactical weapon) in your arsenal to begin unnerving the mullah establishment. Because of group size and available resources, it needs to be relatively small, doable, and result in a success that is noticeable in the larger community. (We'll get back to this one, too.) One of the things we might do as one tactic is beginning to play, and turning their own propaganda game back upon them. Remember small, doable, and a success seen in the community. They're always blasting away about how the resister & protesters are 'mohareb,' so why not select internet photos of a few hard line mullahs, print off a half dozen letter size for each of us (for the maximum size group of 9, that would be a total of 54), with the word MOHAREB stamped on their foreheads, and altogether go out and glue them to walls, sides of buses, inside trains, phone booths, cash machines? Please note, this is a tight, quick-hit-and-run resistance strike force. Do not get separated from the group; if you need to, drop the posters and glue, lock arms, and retreat arm-and-arm. Pull each other to safety, acting as one team. But, can't you just see in your mind's eye mullahs yelling, and turning red-faced at Friday Prayers?
Just examine this tactic for a moment, because it actually says a lot of things. 1. We're not going away, and we're not giving up. 2. You can't intimidate us. 3. We'll catch you where you least expect it, and are weakest. 4. We've just gone into the propaganda publishing business. 5. Hey, you, looking at this poster, go do the same, and have some fun with your computer and printer, and friends. 6. It demonstrates the disrespect they have earned, and gives someone else a smile that "somebody" finally spoke up. 7. It helps to begin building confidence, i.e. Hey, I can do that!
Next week it can be mullah pictures showing the amount of money they've each stashed in foreign banks, with the emboldened words, "Where Is My Money?" If you want bank account numbers, sign into YouTube and enter this search: Iranian Mullahs and Leaders' foreign bank accounts unveiled - Auslandskonten Vermogen der Mullahs. This YouTube listing is not exhaustive, but it's a good start, and will definitely make the point.
There is more needing to be discussed regarding your thoughtful, careful, and in-depth strategic planning process. However, let me back up and expand on a couple of explanations promised earlier. The first is about your 'group,' making up the quick-hit-and-run strike force, and who is the leader. Well, actually, the group already exists and has selected its leader. It is the select group of friends and relatives that you run with, and whom you trust without question. If there is any question about trust, that person(s) must not be included even in discussions, or informed at all. The leader is the woman or man who mostly does that already, that particular someone that everyone respects because they "lead" by wisdom and example, and are not a person who bosses everybody around.
At this phase of resistance the group must remain small (between 3-9 people) because the larger it gets the harder it is to maintain cohesion, loyalty and even avoiding being betrayed. Furthermore, at this point, you do not seek to directly form more groups (discreetly and secretively distribute this manifesto, and let others form themselves into their own secretive unit), nor do you even acknowledge their existence with so much as a wink...if even just happening upon their obvious activities. If someone tries to recruit you to his or her group, simply say you're not interested. I'll talk more about betrayal in a moment.
The reason your tactic(s) needs to be visible in the community is twofold, for bringing hope and new courage to others. Thereby building sympathizers and possible recruits in the future. Whatever your group and others may do, it will definitely bring new results from the regime, and continue to escalate towards greater restrictions and violence. At what point is it justifiable to physically defend yourself? The individual, also, can only answer that question, and certainly debates on the matter are many. With no doubt at all in my mind, I'm convinced the regime will use more and more violence, no matter the peaceful nature of your resistance. Certainly, in this first phase, to resort to physical violence will be attacking the oppressive dictators where you have the least likelihood of any success, and help them justify wholesale slaughter. For the moment, your weapons need to be of another kind. You must outsmart them, while daily cranking up the pressure with added frustration for them.
Concerning betrayal, please take for granted that you will be betrayed. Embrace that fact fully now, and decide ahead of time how you plan to handle it. (I'll not attempt profiling the classic traitor in this phase, reserving that for phase II, though I will have a few thoughts regarding the basij.) One of the biggest damages to winning Irish freedom was the traitor, who, over centuries continued to sell us out to the British. We finally resorted to assassinating each one in public. I'm not saying you should do that, but I am saying you may need to consider that a part of your strategy include a 'symbolic hit squad.' Dr. Sharp has some excellent recommendations about exerting social pressure on traitors. Special symbols painted in bright paint to their front door, published and distributed lists, public shunning, etc. These raise the cost to the traitor of colluding with the regime in any way. Part of the reason you are bothering with all the listing of names, crimes, payments, etc. is to make it clear they will be held accountable before a valid and proper court of law. That we are not planning to be like them, with vengeful bloodbaths, but that they will be held accountable!
Nevertheless, a critical part of your betrayal strategy needs to include identifying when and where to flee, and how everyone is notified to do it on a moment's notice. Identifying "safe refuges" is vital, right at the beginning--today! If you can safely flee as a group into the countryside or wilderness, do so as part of your plan to later rejoin the public struggle once the regime begins to crumble. Practice this plan several times together. These places need to be stocked with the survival food, clothing, blankets, radio, flashlight, computer (with battery charged but not yet inserted), extra batteries, and medical supplies. Your brainstorming needs to round out this list. If one member of your group is a "no show" or is captured, the rest of you quickly raids the refuge yourselves, taking whatever you can carry without exhaustion, and then move on immediately. It is possible to hide in urban areas with some care and additional planning, but works best if there are other people near your "hideout" who are sympathetic to your cause, even if not active resisters themselves. If there is any "general rule" I'd encourage, it is always being careful, observant, and ready for action at all times. Now I will say out the bare facts, i.e. "If you are a Resistance Patriot of any kind, then a state of war exists between you and the current oppressive regime!" And, you have just made yourselves into what we Irish call "Fianna," which translates as Warrior Bands. So, then, your job is NOT to die for the cause, but rather your job is to stay alive, and help the cause bring the regime down around their ears.
Now some thoughts about the altogether despicable basij monsters: First of all, whatever they may have been in the past, that is exactly what they have become "monsters," so let's call them that. They don't even deserve the designation of wolves, because wolves defend their own, and will die rather than betray their pack. Neither, any longer, can they deserve to be classified with genuine military in any fashion, for they follow no true and ancient warriors' code at all. To refer to them as beasts would not even be proper, because dumb beasts have more humanity and honor than these. In fact, through greed and perversion, they have become the embodiment of the Ancient Demon Genies, who feast on dead bodies, and tear the beating hearts out of babies, even perfuming themselves with rotting corpses. They are truly now the assassins sent by devils, those who alone are more evil, are the ones for whom they work. Fitting, is it not, that their ultimate commander is Ali Khamenei?
I have offered this succinctly accurate definition for a number of reasons, not the least being that over the years, I've discovered that when in mortal combat, it is always better to know the true nature of your foe as you draw your sword. These demons have replicated themselves everywhere throughout Iranian society. There are basij physicians, basij university professors, basij dentists, basij social workers, basij nurses, basij kindly old neighbors, basij mullahs, basij psychologists, and basij university students--sitting right next to you! How else do you think the basij knew which specific dormitories, specific rooms, and specific students to hit? They are the traitor-par-excellence! And, they are the assassins all at the same time. Some get paid money for it, but even those who don't receive special "privileges" from the current oppressive regime. You know, privileges like acceptance into university, degrees, advancements, discounts...and, of course, rape, torture and murder. They are more evil than Hitler's Gestapo, the German SS, the Russian KGB, the CIA, and British Foreign Office combined into one, for they devour their own people without shame! In addition, they all have the blessings of mullahs.
May I be so bold as to suggest another subject possible for your resistance planning? It's a poster reading:
"ATTENTION BASIJ! When this regime crumbles, which it will, we are coming for you FIRST!
You will be the first to be herded into the ruins of Evin Prison.
All of your property, bank accounts, degrees, positions and social standing will be forfeited immediately, with the first laws enacted by the new government of Iran.
YOU will be the first to be tried for treason against the people and crimes against humanity, by a special tribunal appointed for that purpose, and if found guilty, you will have the first spaces on the gallows.
SLEEP WELL, basij, you can trust your fellow Iranians to be just with you!"
***More to come***
Resistance Manifesto:
A suggestion to the Iranian Patriots
by Michael J. McCoy
For friend Ali,
who thought it was worth risking his life in protest,
because he wanted to have hope.
But in the end his government betrayed him,
and so did the mullahs of his religion.
May they all rot in a unique hell constructed just for them!
PHASE I -- The Plan To Plan
Resistance to exploitation, oppressive authoritarian rule, restrictive regulations for controlling every aspect and movement of society, including academic inquiry, art, poetry and freedom of a belief and speech, is as old as history itself. Resistance may be viewed as the natural response of the human being to such injustices, and, so is no doubt a part of prehistory as well. If a lion is cornered, certainly no one would question the just right of the lion to fight its way to freedom. And, so there must be no questioning of the ethics, morality, even duty, of people to resist now at this time in history--it is their right!
This commentary reflects my point of view on resistance, which I am convinced must always be "formal" and "calculating" if it is to be successful. By successful I mean it must result in political and sociological self-determination. In that regard, then, this is rudimentary scaffolding from which to build to that end, and without my being forced to engage in any polemics regarding it. I am in hopes you will not believe anything I've proposed here, nor think that I am insisting it is how you must think and act. Rather, I hope you will test every premise or assumption, argue it among yourselves, and reject and/or accept only of what you are convinced. As a bare minimum, I am in hopes the Patriots will continue utilization of resistance as a desirable, albeit limited, method to achieve self-determination for the Iranian people.
At the outset, it is important to understand that, historically, resistance is always the result of the overt actions of the oppressors. The resistance begins only after the patience of the "long-enduring" populace reaches a breaking point. That breaking point may be for various reasons, but is never the preplanned sinister plot emanating from the downtrodden masses. It may appear to be sparked by a seemingly, or actually insignificant issue, which is, in reality, the "last straw" that blows the lid off the simmering societal pressure-cooker. Equally important is that the resistance will generally follow fairly standard protocol, i.e. stages, in response to the very predictable actions of the established regime, which is trying to maintain its power and fringe benefits at any cost.
It is imperative to understand that the dictatorial government is exceptionally dangerous; it has all the guns, finances, structures and machinery of absolute power, and will not give them up willingly, without a bitter, brutal fight! Be under no delusion about this, please. However, this does not mean that the resistance cannot win out in the end. Nevertheless, it is likely to be a long, hard and personally costly affair, which must be accepted by all those active participants of the resistance.
Each stage of the protocol carries clearly discernible characteristics, as well as very real potential dangers to the resistors, and traps that will be laid by the regime. To know in advance is to be forewarned, to be forewarned is to be prepared, to be prepared, is to develop alternate routes of escape, to come back to resist repeatedly. (This "repeatedly" is the secret weapon of resistance, forming the main tactic to wear down the oppressive regime--until it crumbles. It then becomes a major part of the strategy to protect this tactic no matter what else happens!) The historical witness, both ancient and modern, shows clearly that the resistance of the people can and does win against oppressive authoritarian governments, including against their well-equipped paramilitaries, secret services, and special armies. Let's begin examining the stages of resistance, and their evolution from one stage to the next.
Frequently enough, the first stage is a kind of mass struggle, at first taking the form of peaceful protests for grievances to be heard. This may be in the forms of articles, petitions, and/or demonstrations in the streets. This is the point of the first real danger, in the form of governmental response. Most authoritarian, dictatorial regimes view their population as "mere children" needing to be mollycoddled, but incapable of being adults. (At least the ones who have been left alive, that is.) So, the first response is likely to be mild amusement that the "children" are acting up again, how sweet! Though it's not limited to them, theocracies are especially prone to this. It may be one that controls the state, as in Iran, or one where the state is in a league with religion, as is currently the case in Russia. I would include Communism in this as well, because, in its functionality, it is really a secular religion, and as repressive. The strategy here is that if the "parents" simply acknowledge the childish antics, then the children will go back to play with their blocks again. After all, what the little ones are really seeking is simply attention. (Remember Ahmadinejad's comment about the protests being like the turmoil after a football game?) OK, so the danger is in whether or not the protesters are willing to buy into this definition, and assume the position of children again. If they do buy into it, then it was useless to have protested in the first place, but if not, well then, it moves to the next stage.
Stage two often remains in the arena of peaceful protest, but is considerably more determined to resist. It also starts moving towards being multifaceted, i.e. into many different avenues for protest, all of which are dictated by the immediate circumstances. Examples could include spontaneous causal and disjointed organization, distribution of "homegrown" informal publications, pamphlets and tracts, banners and spray-painted slogans on buildings, as well as an expanding number of chanted mottoes. These slogans and mottoes are a major indication that resistance is undergoing a transmutation in the philosophical and psychological underpinnings of the people, and are the first signs that a true movement may be being born. Now the totalitarian regime actually recognizes that it has a real potential problem on its hands, and moves to counter it. This is danger number two of governmental response; beware!
However, before examining the nature and specifics of this second danger, it is necessary to address at least one item the regime has in its arsenal for defeating any resistance. The most insidious, but standard to oppression, is the fact that such regimes "wrap" themselves in what I call "legalize," that is, a show of so called democratically enacted legislation, but which, in fact, has one purpose only--to keep them and their cronies in power. ALL of these are designed to maintain the power elite at the standard of living and other privileges to which they have become accustomed. In this way, they can appeal to the law of the land for justification of their actions, but which, as you will see, are in fact unjust and without conscience.
A very recent example of this from South America was the arrest by the Honduran military, and subsequent exile, of President Zelaya, on the grounds he had violated the law, which he hadn't! The 'behind-the-scenes' reality here is the oligarchic alliances between landowners, businessmen, judiciary and military to maintain the status quo, i.e. that they rule without concessions to the majority of poverty stricken Hondurans. The reason these Honduran power elites do not want the possibility of any president holding a second term, is that he/she might become so popular with the people that their privileged power could be undermined. So they crafted the constitution to allow only one term, and then claimed Zelaya was 'about' to violate the legal constitutional law, and they did it with the support of the judiciary. All of this is, of course, a lie, but does it sound familiar? Moving on to danger number two.
Whatever the nature of the original complaint(s), the regime begins asserting that all its actions were proper and legitimate (i.e. legal under the law) and therefore the resistance is unjustifiable. However, who is in control of all the actions, and what laws are they using? It is the power elite who is in complete control, and the laws being used are those constructed to protect them from any scrutiny or reasonable accountability to those being acted upon--the people! Then, predictably, the regime attempts to throw a magnanimous curve ball, it offers a 'compromise.' Please note that the compromise it offers is always disingenuous (because the only 'virtue' such a totalitarian regime embraces is maintenance of absolute power) and leaves them in complete control. This may be couched in 'understanding' terminology, like, "Of course you are mistaken, but to demonstrate what a good father I am, here, you can have this ice-cream, and it will make you feel all better now." It is, by no stretch of imagination, an outrageous insult to the intellectual integrity of the people.
In the case of your disputed elections in Iran, the original demand was for a new election. This was entirely sidestepped by the powers that be, and the compromise offered was a recount of 10% of the votes. Certainly, Mousavi and the others were right in refusing to accept this, and for good reasons. Firstly, where did these particular votes come from, and who selected them? How is it that 10% is representative of the actual votes anyway? Was this 10% part of the original rigging? If this was really a legitimate solution, why not invite in international participation to do the actual recount of all ballots and then certify the results, or to supervise a new election? Regardless of whether the election was a fraud or not, the real reason this, or something similar, was not done boils down to the exercise of power. To put it bluntly, "I am the grand exalted leader, the all-powerful pooh-bah of the universe, and you are only children, so who are you to question ME?"
Step three of resistance is most often the absolute and public refusal of the people to accept the government response, period, and the demand for sweeping reforms! This is met by the regime with entrenching within its power base. It is here that the regime reveals its true nature for all to see, breaking its own laws and viciously turning on the people in successive bloodbaths. The danger now is that the people will retreat in horror, giving up meaningful resistance to save life and limb. No one, who is not directly affected by this reality, has any right to criticize the choices that only individuals have the right to make. Certainly, cessation of resistance is what the illegitimate regime is hoping, and for which it will deploy all its resources to accomplish. If, however, the people are going to in any way recover and continue resistance, then many stark realities need to be faced coldly, calculatingly and with steeling of the collective will. Brave people of Iran, please forgive me that I now take the liberty to relate certain particulars, some of which you know altogether too well already.
One stark reality needing to be faced is: who are the enemies to your freedom that you now face? This is of utmost importance to define, and about which you must be without doubt. Please be patient with me, as there can be no 'shading' of this matter if you are to be effective in your resistance. So, first of all, who is responsible for the beatings, arrests, torture, rapes and merciless slaughter of protesters? Who initiated, and authorized it? For those who are genuinely and graciously devout, I am grieved to relate the following.
I am not an Iranian, but as I watched and listened to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's sermon (which I did intently) at that fateful Friday Prayers, it became obvious to me that he was, in fact, authorizing violence against lawful protesters, and that his tears were a cheap theatrical stunt! He, himself, was calling out and setting loose his basij monsters to tear the people to pieces. To claim that some underling is to blame, including the despicable Ahmadinejad (though he and others are complicit) is another of the grand lies of this regime. There is nothing that happens in Iran without the consent and knowledge of the Supreme Leader. One of many things that struck me when I watched the video showing where Neda was buried, and the row upon row of freshly dug graves...ready and waiting. I knew instantly the regime was planning to kill lots of people; it was all thought out in advance. The only reason Khamenei shut down one prison, was because the son of an influential man was killed there. He IS your enemy.
However, there are others who also must be identified (which we will continue to do shortly) unequivocally as enemies to your freedom. This is necessary in order to properly evaluate the forces arrayed against you, and to begin developing strategy and tactic to continue resistance. If resist is what you really want to do, then now is not too early to define resistance to what end, i.e. what do you want to be the result? You, who identify with the democracy movement in Iran must define that for yourselves. I've seen your protests referred to as 'revolution,' though it appears to me at this point to be a civil rights movement, yet in the process of being born. For now, as a possibility, please consider seriously Dr. Gene Sharp's words: "We have argued here that overthrow of the dictatorship or removal of the present dictators is not enough. The objective in these conflicts needs to be the establishment of a free society with a democratic system of government."(1) With this as a 'working' beginning, let's identify the other "present dictators" of this dictatorial regime. The following is a listing of those from whom you must not expect any help in your cause, or even dare to trust them in anything--except ruthlessness!
General Hassan Firouzabadi, the Joint Chief of Staff of regular military and Revolutionary Guards, and Hezbollah shock troops. He has vowed to use the military against the people of Iran.
Hossein Hamedani, deputy commander of basij militia, and one of many responsible for beatings, abductions, tortures, rapes and executions of Iranians.
Brigadier General Yadollah Javani, head of political bureau, and propaganda director of Revolutionary Guards, who wants to blind "completely" the eyes of protesters, and "gouge" them out.
Mojtaha Khamenei, (a one time?) commander of basij assassins, the likely organizer of fraudulent election,
Hossein Shariat Madari, editor of Keyhan Newspaper, tool of supreme leader and intelligence services, and an interrogator at Evin prison.
Prosecutor General Saeed Mourtazavi, known as the "butcher of the press," and responsible for detention, torture and death of unknown numbers of Iranian journalists and citizens.
Brigadier General Ahmad-Reza Radan, acting police chief of Teharan, responsible for punishing thousands of young "criminals" detained for offending Islamic morals, some resulting in hangings.
Brigadier General Qassem Soleimani, commander of Quods Force, and who answers directly to Ali Khamenei.
Mojtaba Zolnour, is Khamenei's representative to the Revolutionary Guards, ensuring everyone in the command structure is loyal to the supreme leader. He claims that nearly everyone has confessed.
These constitute the most ferocious and strongest wall of defense around the authoritarian regime, and rightly identified as part of the "band of dictators." That is not to say, as resistance gains adherents and celebrates some minor successes, farther down the road that lower ranking individual military officers and personnel will not be secretly supportive. Nevertheless, those at the top of whatever branch of the existing regime and its various ministries must not be trusted, parleyed with, or entered into negotiations with for any reason. Second, third and fourth in command must not be trusted either. The same goes for the latest appointments and reshuffling of officials. Inspired by a statement the South American freedom fighter, Che Guevara, made,(2) this latter group may be viewed as what I have referred to as "the dictator with the smiling face." Certainly that phrase is worth remembering, as the regime will present such a face repeatedly--do not allow yourselves to be deceived, or weaken your resolve. The dictator with the smiling face will never let you be free, only add a few more rings to the chain already attached to your ankle, so that you feel you are!
The role of clergy in all this also demands resolute examination, and willingness to face the clear facts, no matter your emotional response or wishful thinking. They are also part of the forces arrayed against a longing for your own free society and democratic way of life. In most oppressive regimes to even use the word 'democracy' can land you in prison. Who is forbidding you to use it now? Please understand, I am not saying one should hold this religion or that one, or none at all. What I'm saying is that, historically, when the clerics are ruling the society it has not forebode well for the people's freedom in all respects. This is so no matter what theocracy it is, whether Judaism, Islam, Confucianism, Hinduism, Buddhist, or within Christianity: Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Protestantism, Mormonism and the Byzantine Empire. And, always, the rights of children and women have suffered. Don't take my word for it. Go look for yourselves.
I'm Irish, and it took us 800 years to get the British Empire out of our country, including many bloody battles. Once we were free, do you know what we discovered? We discovered it was the clergy who had sold us out in the first place, literally, to the British...so the Pope could use the king to collect the Papal taxes, that we Irish were refusing to pay. It was for power and money, while the clergy grew fat and the people starved! Persia, too, has a long history of clergy betrayals, some even back into pre-Islamic time. Witness the seminal work of Ferdowsi, Shahnameh, about Prime Minister Mazdak,(3) and more recent clergy involvement as well.(4) Use of religion can be especially insidious as a control and repression mechanism, because of its psychological advantage, which lulls the people into a state of acquiescence--as it speaks for God, so who can "dare" to resist the clergy.
Certainly, your own Dr. Shariati's convictions on "religious government" are of particular relevance for Iran today, where he says:
"A religious regime is one in which, instead of the political figures, religious figures take up political and governmental positions. In other words, a religious regime means the rule of the clerics. One natural consequence of such a regime is dictatorship, because the cleric views himself as God's representative who carries out His orders on earth, and therefore, people have no right to express their opinions, or criticize and oppose him.
"A religious leader considers himself automatically a leader (of the state) due to being a cleric and religious scholar, not due to the people's vote, view and approval. Thus, he is also a ruler without any responsibility (for whatever he does), and this (thinking) is the mother of the dictatorship by one person (over the masses). And because he considers himself the shadow and representative of God (on earth), he also rules over people's lives and belongings. He allows no doubt (to be expressed) in any oppression and repression that he commits, because he sees God's approval (satisfaction) in it (in what he does). Aside from this, he does not recognize any rights, even the right to live, for the opposition and followers of other religions, because he considers them as the target of God's wrath, deviated from the true path, unclean, and an enemy of (his) religion's path, and views their oppression as God's justice."(5)
The only real and lasting solution is a separation of religion from secular government, with no religion either supported by it, or in a favored status. Talk to your parents and grand parents, and ask them: "When you voted 30 years ago, did you really think this is what we would get? Did you even dream that the clergy would progressively hijack our country, and our freedoms stolen from us? A country where now old men sentence women to be beaten for how they dress, and children are raped and hung to death? Is this the country you really wanted for us?" My friends, you must add the clergy to your list, and especially the most ruthless and powerful ones...you must do it! Please forgive me but here, then, is a start:
Ahmad Khatami, a member of the Assembly of Experts, who wants to charge protesters as "mohareb" (those who wage war against God) and sentence them to death.
Hojatoleslam Mostafa Pourmohammadi, who, among his other "stunning" achievements, was put in charge of the "Death Committees" responsible for massacres of some 30,000 political prisoners ordered by Ayatollah Khomeini. He is often in charge of maintaining the power of the clerical monarchy.
Ayatollah Mohammad Taghi Mesbah Yasdi, member of the Assembly of Experts, spiritual leader of Ahmadinejad, Revolutionary Guard and basij, and noted for his role in the brutal suppression of the reformist movement a decade ago.
Other notables, could well include the following mullahs, and others, with private accounts in foreign banks:
Ali Khamenei, = approximately 282 millions.
Ali Akbar Hashemi Rasfandjani, = approximately one billion, and 247 millions.
Mohammad Ali Tasskhiri, = approximately 340 millions.
Mohammad Golpayegani, = approximately 87 millions.
Ahmad Jannati, = approximately 54 millions.
Abdollah Nategh Nouri, = approximately 187 millions.
Abbas Vaez-Tabassi, = approximately 313 millions.
Abbas-Ali Forooghi, = approximately 10 millions (a mere pauper by comparison).
Not even counting all the other mullah bank accounts (does God even know how many mullahs there really are?), or accounts for other officials of the Islamic Republic of Iran, but just from above, it's a cool 2,520,000,000 folks. Let's see if I've got this right: China and Russia buy oil from Iran's government. Iran supports foreign fighters in Lebanon and elsewhere. Russia and China sell weapons to the dictator, and China gets to dump its cheap, inferior products into Iran, putting Iranians out of work. The Revolutionary Guard sells their products to Iranian citizens also, thereby helping to fund their repression of the people. Then the clergy deposit huge amounts of money in offshore banks. Of course, who could doubt the integrity of the clergy in such an operation? Don't you see? It's all about their power, their money, their privileges, and their perks! Well, and, they do get to run around wearing such holy-looking robes and all, spouting platitudes about how 'we' should live godly lives. I can think of only one word, "farce."
OK, so now you have a pretty good idea of the forces arrayed against your resistance movement, and you as individuals. Where do you go from here, what will be you resistance strategy? What is your step number four? As tiring as it sounds, and IS, you begin with deciding that you absolutely must plan ahead. You bring together a small, select group of your best minds, some of which (though not all) must have an eye for detail. The number of people at this point is roughly five, but no more than nine. (In a moment we'll look at who is the leader of the planning, and how this group is selected.) For now, think in terms of asking a series of "what-ifs?" Of necessity, the very first one is "what if we take head-on all the forces arrayed against us, i.e. a frontal attack? (Now, everybody look up at the ceiling, picturing in your mind all the military, air force, navy, basij, and of course, mullahs in front of you.) So if you did the frontal attack, what would be the result, and is that what you want to happen? Unless you've decided that being killed (literally) will further the resistance, you then discard this idea (for now) as not a desirable strategy.
However, each of the components making up the oppressive regime is not all powerful alone, and by now is probably paranoid because of your past resistance and demonstrations, etc. So, "what-if" we selected the one that would be the least likely immediate physical threat? As illustration, I'm going to say you decide part of your strategy will be chipping-away at the confidence and security of the mullahs. Think in terms of your 'army' being this small group, for the moment, and answer: "How can we do it, and have the desired result?" Anything is worth considering, and nothing is a dumb possibility to consider, even if later you decide we'd better not do that. How you decide to take action is "one tactic" (tactical weapon) in your arsenal to begin unnerving the mullah establishment. Because of group size and available resources, it needs to be relatively small, doable, and result in a success that is noticeable in the larger community. (We'll get back to this one, too.) One of the things we might do as one tactic is beginning to play, and turning their own propaganda game back upon them. Remember small, doable, and a success seen in the community. They're always blasting away about how the resister & protesters are 'mohareb,' so why not select internet photos of a few hard line mullahs, print off a half dozen letter size for each of us (for the maximum size group of 9, that would be a total of 54), with the word MOHAREB stamped on their foreheads, and altogether go out and glue them to walls, sides of buses, inside trains, phone booths, cash machines? Please note, this is a tight, quick-hit-and-run resistance strike force. Do not get separated from the group; if you need to, drop the posters and glue, lock arms, and retreat arm-and-arm. Pull each other to safety, acting as one team. But, can't you just see in your mind's eye mullahs yelling, and turning red-faced at Friday Prayers?
Just examine this tactic for a moment, because it actually says a lot of things. 1. We're not going away, and we're not giving up. 2. You can't intimidate us. 3. We'll catch you where you least expect it, and are weakest. 4. We've just gone into the propaganda publishing business. 5. Hey, you, looking at this poster, go do the same, and have some fun with your computer and printer, and friends. 6. It demonstrates the disrespect they have earned, and gives someone else a smile that "somebody" finally spoke up. 7. It helps to begin building confidence, i.e. Hey, I can do that!
Next week it can be mullah pictures showing the amount of money they've each stashed in foreign banks, with the emboldened words, "Where Is My Money?" If you want bank account numbers, sign into YouTube and enter this search: Iranian Mullahs and Leaders' foreign bank accounts unveiled - Auslandskonten Vermogen der Mullahs. This YouTube listing is not exhaustive, but it's a good start, and will definitely make the point.
There is more needing to be discussed regarding your thoughtful, careful, and in-depth strategic planning process. However, let me back up and expand on a couple of explanations promised earlier. The first is about your 'group,' making up the quick-hit-and-run strike force, and who is the leader. Well, actually, the group already exists and has selected its leader. It is the select group of friends and relatives that you run with, and whom you trust without question. If there is any question about trust, that person(s) must not be included even in discussions, or informed at all. The leader is the woman or man who mostly does that already, that particular someone that everyone respects because they "lead" by wisdom and example, and are not a person who bosses everybody around.
At this phase of resistance the group must remain small (between 3-9 people) because the larger it gets the harder it is to maintain cohesion, loyalty and even avoiding being betrayed. Furthermore, at this point, you do not seek to directly form more groups (discreetly and secretively distribute this manifesto, and let others form themselves into their own secretive unit), nor do you even acknowledge their existence with so much as a wink...if even just happening upon their obvious activities. If someone tries to recruit you to his or her group, simply say you're not interested. I'll talk more about betrayal in a moment.
The reason your tactic(s) needs to be visible in the community is twofold, for bringing hope and new courage to others. Thereby building sympathizers and possible recruits in the future. Whatever your group and others may do, it will definitely bring new results from the regime, and continue to escalate towards greater restrictions and violence. At what point is it justifiable to physically defend yourself? The individual, also, can only answer that question, and certainly debates on the matter are many. With no doubt at all in my mind, I'm convinced the regime will use more and more violence, no matter the peaceful nature of your resistance. Certainly, in this first phase, to resort to physical violence will be attacking the oppressive dictators where you have the least likelihood of any success, and help them justify wholesale slaughter. For the moment, your weapons need to be of another kind. You must outsmart them, while daily cranking up the pressure with added frustration for them.
Concerning betrayal, please take for granted that you will be betrayed. Embrace that fact fully now, and decide ahead of time how you plan to handle it. (I'll not attempt profiling the classic traitor in this phase, reserving that for phase II, though I will have a few thoughts regarding the basij.) One of the biggest damages to winning Irish freedom was the traitor, who, over centuries continued to sell us out to the British. We finally resorted to assassinating each one in public. I'm not saying you should do that, but I am saying you may need to consider that a part of your strategy include a 'symbolic hit squad.' Dr. Sharp has some excellent recommendations about exerting social pressure on traitors. Special symbols painted in bright paint to their front door, published and distributed lists, public shunning, etc. These raise the cost to the traitor of colluding with the regime in any way. Part of the reason you are bothering with all the listing of names, crimes, payments, etc. is to make it clear they will be held accountable before a valid and proper court of law. That we are not planning to be like them, with vengeful bloodbaths, but that they will be held accountable!
Nevertheless, a critical part of your betrayal strategy needs to include identifying when and where to flee, and how everyone is notified to do it on a moment's notice. Identifying "safe refuges" is vital, right at the beginning--today! If you can safely flee as a group into the countryside or wilderness, do so as part of your plan to later rejoin the public struggle once the regime begins to crumble. Practice this plan several times together. These places need to be stocked with the survival food, clothing, blankets, radio, flashlight, computer (with battery charged but not yet inserted), extra batteries, and medical supplies. Your brainstorming needs to round out this list. If one member of your group is a "no show" or is captured, the rest of you quickly raids the refuge yourselves, taking whatever you can carry without exhaustion, and then move on immediately. It is possible to hide in urban areas with some care and additional planning, but works best if there are other people near your "hideout" who are sympathetic to your cause, even if not active resisters themselves. If there is any "general rule" I'd encourage, it is always being careful, observant, and ready for action at all times. Now I will say out the bare facts, i.e. "If you are a Resistance Patriot of any kind, then a state of war exists between you and the current oppressive regime!" And, you have just made yourselves into what we Irish call "Fianna," which translates as Warrior Bands. So, then, your job is NOT to die for the cause, but rather your job is to stay alive, and help the cause bring the regime down around their ears.
Now some thoughts about the altogether despicable basij monsters: First of all, whatever they may have been in the past, that is exactly what they have become "monsters," so let's call them that. They don't even deserve the designation of wolves, because wolves defend their own, and will die rather than betray their pack. Neither, any longer, can they deserve to be classified with genuine military in any fashion, for they follow no true and ancient warriors' code at all. To refer to them as beasts would not even be proper, because dumb beasts have more humanity and honor than these. In fact, through greed and perversion, they have become the embodiment of the Ancient Demon Genies, who feast on dead bodies, and tear the beating hearts out of babies, even perfuming themselves with rotting corpses. They are truly now the assassins sent by devils, those who alone are more evil, are the ones for whom they work. Fitting, is it not, that their ultimate commander is Ali Khamenei?
I have offered this succinctly accurate definition for a number of reasons, not the least being that over the years, I've discovered that when in mortal combat, it is always better to know the true nature of your foe as you draw your sword. These demons have replicated themselves everywhere throughout Iranian society. There are basij physicians, basij university professors, basij dentists, basij social workers, basij nurses, basij kindly old neighbors, basij mullahs, basij psychologists, and basij university students--sitting right next to you! How else do you think the basij knew which specific dormitories, specific rooms, and specific students to hit? They are the traitor-par-excellence! And, they are the assassins all at the same time. Some get paid money for it, but even those who don't receive special "privileges" from the current oppressive regime. You know, privileges like acceptance into university, degrees, advancements, discounts...and, of course, rape, torture and murder. They are more evil than Hitler's Gestapo, the German SS, the Russian KGB, the CIA, and British Foreign Office combined into one, for they devour their own people without shame! In addition, they all have the blessings of mullahs.
May I be so bold as to suggest another subject possible for your resistance planning? It's a poster reading:
"ATTENTION BASIJ! When this regime crumbles, which it will, we are coming for you FIRST!
You will be the first to be herded into the ruins of Evin Prison.
All of your property, bank accounts, degrees, positions and social standing will be forfeited immediately, with the first laws enacted by the new government of Iran.
YOU will be the first to be tried for treason against the people and crimes against humanity, by a special tribunal appointed for that purpose, and if found guilty, you will have the first spaces on the gallows.
SLEEP WELL, basij, you can trust your fellow Iranians to be just with you!"
***More to come***
(1) Gene Sharp, From Dictatorship to Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation (The Albert Einstein Institution, 2003), p. 41. I cannot recommend strongly enough that you all read his book, and obtain the others to which he refers.
(2) "...The fighters, if weary, begin to lose faith..(then government) maneuvers may bear fruit--for example, the holding of elections to turn the government over to another gentleman with a sweeter voice and more angelic face than the outgoing tyrant, or the staging of a coup...generally by the army..." Che Guevara, Guerrilla Warfare: A Method (Che Guevara Studies Center and Ocean Press, 2005) p. 9.
(3) See Tehran Bureau's excellent article, The Coup Against Mazdakite, online at: http://tehranbureau.com/coup-mazdakite/
(4) See Tehran Bureau's, History Used and Abused: The role of the clergy in August 19, 1953 coup against Mossadegh. I had originally included the link, but their new web site no longer supports it. It is, however, worth the time for a title search on their new site. The same for below.
(5) See Tehran Bureau's article, Shariati on Religious Government.
(2) "...The fighters, if weary, begin to lose faith..(then government) maneuvers may bear fruit--for example, the holding of elections to turn the government over to another gentleman with a sweeter voice and more angelic face than the outgoing tyrant, or the staging of a coup...generally by the army..." Che Guevara, Guerrilla Warfare: A Method (Che Guevara Studies Center and Ocean Press, 2005) p. 9.
(3) See Tehran Bureau's excellent article, The Coup Against Mazdakite, online at: http://tehranbureau.com/coup-mazdakite/
(4) See Tehran Bureau's, History Used and Abused: The role of the clergy in August 19, 1953 coup against Mossadegh. I had originally included the link, but their new web site no longer supports it. It is, however, worth the time for a title search on their new site. The same for below.
(5) See Tehran Bureau's article, Shariati on Religious Government.
